Wednesday, February 8, 2012

Poll: What Book Should I Start Reviewing Here?

With the my dropping of Hawk and Dove, a slot has opened up in my review schedule here at the Comic Box.

The last time I had an opening like this was when R.E.B.E.L.S. got cancelled. At that point, I posted a poll asking what book folks wanted me to start reviewing. The winner was Legion. I have been reviewing Legion and subsequently Legion Lost ever since.

Here are some ideas I had as to which book might best fit the theme of this blog. I hope people will vote.



1) Justice League - This is something of a natural fit as Superman is on the team and thus would dovetail nicely into this blog's focus. Add to that it is the tent pole DC book right now, written by megastar Geoff Johns and drawn by mega-megastar Jim Lee.


2) Justice League Dark - The book stars a bunch of my favorite DC characters - John Constantine, Shade the Changing Man, Zatanna, and Madame Xanadu. It also includes old Supergirl nemesis The Enchantress. It sports nifty art by Mikel Janin. And it is pretty twisted, a different sort of book for me here.


3) Birds of Prey - This book is tied with Superboy for my surprise hit of the New 52. I am an Oracle guy and a Huntress guy, so to see a BoP without either didn't make much sense. I only got the first issue because I had bought enough other booksat my comic store to get a free #1 and chose this on a whim. I have been struck by the great characterization by Duane Swierczynski and the beautiful art by Jesus Saiz on the book. I have been on the Birds of Prey bandwagon since Gail Simone first took over so I wouldn't mind supporting this book.


4) World's Finest (when it comes out) - I have done my best to keep this blog a 'Power Girl free zone' as much as possible. Supergirl isn't Power Girl and vice versa. I don't want to muddy those waters here.  I wanted this blog to celebrate Supergirl and I thought Power Girl might detract from Supergirl. I like Power Girl a lot, don't get me wrong. I collected the Palmiotti/Conner run and loved it. So is this new World's Finest, starring the Huntress (who I love), and with art by Perez and Maguire, the opening Power Girl needed to get some Anj coverage?


5) Kirby Genesis: Captain Victory - It would be a break from the 'DC only' feel to this place (Kelly DeConnick's Sif one shot being the only non-DC book I have reviewed here). But it is a Sterling Gates' book. And these are some wild Jack Kirby ideas here.



6) Other - My pull list is here. Should it be Wonder Woman? Demon Knights? Maybe a wild card - a different book each month depending on which one wowed me?

I hope people visiting will vote!

Tuesday, February 7, 2012

Review: Hawk And Dove #6


So I just don't know where to begin my review of Hawk and Dove #6. Perhaps the bottom line is the best place.

I am dropping the title.

Maybe the best place to start this review is going back to the very nature of the New 52 relaunch. The way it has sounded in a variety of places is that creators 'pitched' there ideas about titles to DC and the powers-that-be in the company gave the green light to the pitch that had the most merit or sales appeal. But someone somewhere must have liked the idea enough to say 'go for it'.

So as a reader, when I have seen many of the first 52 undergo 'new directions' and 'new creative teams' before the book is a half a year old, it makes me question the wisdom of the people making creative decisions. It also makes me wonder if DC has the guts to give a solid story the chance to gain a word of mouth buzz before pulling the plug due to low sales.

Case in point, Hawk and Dove. I am sure Sterling Gates made a pitch about the nature of the avatars, an interesting wrinkle between Dawn and Don, all while rolling in some older threads and characters. And yet after 4+ issues, and admittedly lower sales, Gates was shown the door and Rob Liefeld was given the reins of the book. And just like that, an interesting story arc is truncated and swept under the rug.

And to add insult to injury to those of us who enjoyed the initial premise, DC then cancelled the book. Why not let Gates and his initial pitch run the course of the book if it was going to go away in a couple of months anyways?

Instead we get Hawk and Dove #6, a book riddled with inconsistencies, bizarre characterization, and plenty of big splashy panels and double page spreads making it feel like a 10page story spread out over 20 pages. And this book added very little to the characters or the story so far.

Even the cover seems off as it makes it seem like there is no Hawk in the book. But Hawk is here. This isn't Batman and Dove as much as Hawk and Dove, guest starring Batman and Robin.


I spoke of inconsistencies and the thing that gets me is that Rob Liefeld both wrote and drew the book. So there really should be no inconsistencies.

So the book opens with Hawk being chased/fighting old Batman villain around the rooftops of Gotham. So if it one thing I have learned in these six issues, Rob Liefeld loves rooftops and warehouses. Anyways, we get several pages of a slugfest with lots of closeups of Hawk like above.


But on page 6 we find out that Blockbuster was chasing Hawk to get an amulet that Hawk happens to be wearing. Except where was that amulet the first 5 pages. Certainly not in the first panel I showed (or any others before this one). Inconsistent.

There isn't much discussion about the amulet, where it comes from, its powers, or why Hawk decided that wearing it loosely around his neck was the best way to protect it.


Blockbuster takes off, but before Hawk can give chase, he is wrapped up by a bat-rope thrown by Robin. If this is Damian, he looks about 10yrs too old. This looks like Tim Drake. Inconsistent.

Now why Robin would stop the hero and not the known supervillain behemoth, I can't explain.

It does lead to some sassing between Hawk and Robin. Really, Hawk is going to get into a schoolboy tiff with a 12 yr old? And then the avatar of war lands a straight kick to Robin's jaw. Now earlier we saw Hawk slug Blockbuster and rattle the brute. So shouldn't this kick explode Damian's head? Inconsistent.

Batman shows up, growling that Gotham is his city and Hawk and Dove need to play by his rules. It turns out that Blockbuster is the errand boy for the Necromancer who is gathering magic items to do some spell. And where is she doing it? In a warehouse. At least it isn't on a rooftop.


Batman and Hawk fight Blockbuster. Batman lands a punch to Blockbuster which makes him groggy enough for Hawk to finish him off. But earlier, a Hawk right hook to the chin followed by a Dove (said to be stronger than Hawk in this issue) kick to the chops doesn't even slow Blockbuster down. So is Batman stronger than them?

And then Batman casually asks if 'all the avatars of war' are as strong as Hawk. But Hawk just learned about their existence. So how does Batman know? I know ... because he's Batman. But it felt off and seemed to downplay the importance of the revelation in the last arc.


Meanwhile, Dove grabs the amulet, breaking the spell.

Here is another inconsistency that irked me. Robin says his left jab, right uppercut combo is stopping Necromancer. But that's a right cross not an uppercut. Again, this is Liefeld drawing Liefeld's words. They should be consistent.

I always say comics work best when words and images complement each other. When they are out of synch, it makes for lousy reading.


And just like that the book is over with the heroes striking a classic team-up pose. But it feels forced, not natural. Doesn't anyone believe in looking someone in the face when having a conversation?

Batman says that if the two can learn to work together they might be a valuable addition to the hero community. But this isn't a 'new' Hawk and Dove. They have been around for a while, especially Hawk. So Batman talking about them as if they are rookies felt wrong.

Anyways, so this book felt like something of a scramble. And there was nothing about it that makes me want to read the last 2 issues of the run. And it's a shame because the threads about the avatars mythos in the first issues and the Dawn/Don connection won't be resolved.

But that means that DC thought that THIS book was a better direction than the way the book was going the first 4 issues. And that is the scariest thing about this issue. Because it makes me worry.

Overall grade: F

Monday, February 6, 2012

Review: Action Comics #6 Back-Up


Grant Morrison is doing the heavy lifting in Action Comics, laying out the Man of Steel's first super-hero adventure. In the back-up feature, Sholly Fisch is giving us wonderful glimpses into the events that made Clark who he is. Last month's look at the Kent's trials and tribulations around conceiving was sweet and beautiful.

Action Comics #6 back-up takes a much closer look at Clark's childhood, focusing on the day he is leaving Smallville and heading to Metropolis. Much like what Morrison is doing in the main story, Fisch is really giving us glimpses into Clark's past, giving us some but not all information, and building a complete story through these captured moments. Sure, we see enough of Lana Lang and Pete Ross here to get a feel for their friendship with Clark. But things are implied, not shown. It leaves the door open for more.

And as this is Smallville, we really get sun-dappled art by Chris Cross. His sometimes heavy lines are gone here, and the coloring by Jose Villarrubia really adds to the story. There is a feeling of country sunshine here, brightness, but also the hint of sunset ... reminding us Clark is moving on.

So we see Clark give the Kent farm to the Fry family, a neighbor whose farm was foreclosed. With Clark moving on, the farm needs to be tended. Why not give it to someone who has been oppressed?

This really has a Golden/Silver Age feel to it. There isn't a Kent homestead for Clark to retreat to, no chance to pick Ma and Pa's brains for wisdom like in the Byrne era. This chapter in his life is closed.

As Clark roams through the house one last time, he is struck by memories.

One is him crying, wondering why he is different.

I liked this one, Pa talking about how Clark needs to stand up to the bullies in life ... the oppressors. Look at how almost washed out the art looks here, like a faded photograph. Just a great mix of words, theme, and art.


This was perhaps my favorite page in the whole book. What a home run by Cross!

But more than that, you get the sense that Lana is in on the secret. She says that Clark has too much to offer to the world than to stay on the farm. And how else did they get up there? What else could Clark mean when he asks her is he should take her down? He leaped up there with her.

And Lana leaning her head on Clark's shoulder. Wonderful. And again, that sort of brightness to the art just works. If I knew it wouldn't be ludicrously expensive, I'd buy this page.


But the time has come for Clark to move on. The Smallville Three Musketeers are breaking up because Clark has bigger things he needs to accomplish.

It is also clear that Pete isn't in on the secret (at least not openly, remember he did know in the Silver Age). But he seems surprised at how heavy Clark's boxes are. If he knew Clark could juggle cars, he woudn't be shocked.

Smiling, Clark leaves his home, heading to the big city.

These quiet moments, these looks back, tell us how and more importantly why Clark is Superman. There is the perfect feel of innocence in this short story, a sort of idyllic setting explaining how Clark became the ethical and helpful person he is. Just great stuff.

In some ways I am envious of Fisch. He gets to puts some bricks in the foundation of this Superman. But rather than having to write the bluster of heat vision and K-Bombs, he gets to write these more personal moments that add depth the the characters here. I would love that gig.

And Cross' art here is the right fit, matching the mood of the story perfectly.

Overall grade: A

Saturday, February 4, 2012

Current Pull List

After discussing the Watchmen mini-series I will probably be purchasing, I realized that I had not updated my Pull List Page in a loooonng long time. So it is now up to date.

And here it is. Is it too long? Do I read too many comics??


DC Monthlies:
Action Comics
Animal Man
Batman Inc (Upcoming)
Batwoman
Birds of Prey
Demon Knights
Earth 2 (upcoming)
Green Lantern
Justice League of America
Justice League Dark
Legion Lost
Legion of Superheroes
Superboy
Supergirl
Superman
Wonder Woman
World's Finest (upcoming)

DC Mini's:
Legion Secret Origin
My Greatest Adventure
The Huntress


Marvel:
Captain America
Daredevil
Invincible Iron Man
Uncanny X-Men


Indy (monthly, minis, and sporadics):
Atomic Robo
Conan (Brian Wood/Becky Cloonan) (upcoming)
Casanova Avarita
Fatale
Kirby Genesis
Kirby Genesis:Captain Victory
Rachel Rising

Of the current list, I am enjoying most of these titles. So as of right now, most of these titles are safe.Most.

Anything I'm not buying that I should try??

Friday, February 3, 2012

Review: Action Comics #6


Action Comics #6
came out this week and continued the dizzying pace that Grant Morrison has brought to this title since the relaunch. This is a side adventure, a two issue nugget in which a future Superman and the Legion come back to save the day. While the young Superman is battling the Collector on Earth, the future Superman is trying to save his rocket ship from dying. And the stakes are high, if the rocket runs out of energy, the Collector can take over Earth's computer systems, dooming the planet.

Morrison is at his best here, flinging ideas at us effortlessly, giving us just enough information for the story to make sense but leaving enough unsaid that there is more mystery after this issue than there was before. And there isn't that obtuse feeling that Morrison sometimes veers towards; this isn't the incomprehensible Final Crisis ending. There is a meaty story here, enough to make me wish there was more. And yet, it is wrapped up neatly in two issues and the title will go back to the initial story next issue. Consider my appetite whetted.

But perhaps the greatest compliment I can give the issue is that I really felt blown away by it. Stunned enough to read it again immediately after reading it the first time despite the stack of new unread comics sitting next to me. Amazed enough to have another long time comic fan send me an email saying he was blown away by it.

And frankly, it is that sense of wonder and amazement and entertainment that makes me read comics in the first place. After reading a day's worth of bitter tit-for-tat about Watchmen prequels, Action Comics #6 reminded me why I have stuck with this hobby.

Last issue ended with the Anti-Superman army stealing the Kryptonite engine from Clark's ship.

Here we see that crew talking to the gnome-like guy who was with Glenmorgan in issue one. He clearly seems to be the brains behind this operation but the real grab here are these villains. We really don't know any of them.

We learn that one is from Trom, Element Lad's home planet. This bandaged man I initially thought was General Zod. But is that a war hammer on his back? I thought the robot looking being with the rifle might be an updated Terra Man, but a later reference to a Nimrod the Hunter seems more apt. I thought the circled trio in the back might be a 21st century Dark Circle (given the Legion riff) but they are later named the Sisterhood of Abiding Hate (pure Morrison there). But what about the little girl in the polka dot skirt? The Green K man we saw last issue. The bald headed man is called Doctor but who is he?

And to add to that, they each speak in different colored word balloons and they call themselves the K-Men. Are they powered by the various isotopes of Kryptonite ... red, silver, black, and blue? And why is blue called the 'most terrible of all'? Is there word balloon color mirror the Kryptonite that powers them?

Morrison is teasing us here. And I love it.


The gnome says he will give each of them a shard of Kryptonite if they each perform an act in his name.

I said it before ... I'll say it again. His name is Mxyzptlk. It has to be.


Meanwhile, the future Legion and Superman strategize in the Collector's satellite, at the site of the rocket. The rocket is running out of energy and only Kryptonite can keep it active.

Again, Morrison is teasing us here. This Superman says that Superman will eventually adopt this satellite as his first Fortress of Solitude. So we will eventually see that story. And we know that eventually we will see a different Fortress.

But there is the classic time travel trippiness about this story, Superman saying he remembers this adventure except he remembers finding the engine intact.


But the K-Men have left an agent behind, Erik Drekken who somehow has the power to evolve/devolve at will. It is hinted at that he is Titano (recently seen in Perez' Superman). He becomes a giant squid like monster, a gibbon, and even a worm over the course of this issue. But here, he is defeated, reverts to his human form, and lets his mind wander just a but much. He thinks of where the K-Men are hiding the engine ...


And they are hiding in the one place Superman would never think to look ... inside himself! They are inside a tesseract space in a bullet in his brain shot there by Nimrod. That is fantastic. Superman can't fight a fight inside himself!

And more importantly ... when did he get shot? Is that in the future? Or was that while he was here in the past.


Another thing that I loved about this issue, both here and in the backup feature, were the flashbacks to the Kents and the wisdom they have given Clark throughout his life. While the Kents might not be part of Clark's life in his adult years, he is who he is because of how they raised him. That has always been a truth in Superman's origin. That the values of the Kents made Clark think he was a man first, a superman second.

Here, Saturn Girl has to mind probe Superman to try to triangulate the bullet's position based on abnormalities in his thinking (here by having the details of this memory ... things like a farmhouse's color ... be fuzzy, Imra knows the bullet is near his amygdala).

But that is some classic Pa Kent there. Clark needs to use his powers to help and inspire other people. That he needs to be a role model, showing people the best they can be. That is the Superman I want. Not the distrusted and vilified guy in the Perez book.


So you might ask why don't the villains simply kill Superman from the inside out. Well, they are at the mercy of an invulnerable environment. Invulnerable brain cortex can crush you if you are that small.

And what of this comment that the bullet explains his recent behavior? Is that the behavior we see in the Perez book? Or is that behavior in upcoming Morrison issues?? My mind reels ... fantastic.


The Legion arrives inside the tesseract, tricks the K-Men into attacking themselves, and grab some of the Kryptonite.

There is more to this gnome-guy than meets the eye. And Imra, someone Lightning Man brags can understand any language, can understand that language. Perhaps because it is from another dimension?

In another good Morrison twist, we don't see the Legion mop up. They defeat the Anti-Superman Army off screen. Now sometimes I complain about stuff like that. But in this instance, it isn't the Legion fight that is the climax to this story, it is what is happening on the satellite.


With the Kryptonite shattered and scattered, Superman begins to succumb to Kryptonite Poisoning.

But in those throes, he realizes that the K-energy in his body can power his rocket's engine. And despite the attempts of Drekken to stop him, despite the pain ravaging his body, he doesn't give up. He staggers to the engine and uses his own radiation to repower it. And the rocket, in return, blasts Drekken to continue it's mission to protect Kal.

But it is that 'never give in' moment, paired with the Pa Kent deathbed exchange, that makes this scene. That is Superman, remembering that his upbringing taught him to be a force for good, to never give in, to fight a never-ending battle. Add to that the self-sacrifice of dragging his dying body to the rocket, willing to die to save the Earth and you have what Superman should be ... needs to be.

With the engine repowered by the reclaimed Kryptonite, with the villains defeated (although I guess they are still in a bullet in Superman's head to be removed later), the Legion heads out with Superman in the time bubble. This side adventure is over and no one on Earth knew it happened.

And it ends on a great note. One of the memories Imra looked at in Superman's mind was the first time the Legion met Clark. Clad in more classic Legion togs, they wondered why this mythic hero was a scrawny gawky kid. And yet, it was that moment that helped Clark truly realize that the Earth was worth fighting for, worth being a hero for.

It was a wild, madcap, frenetic ride with action and emotional resonance, and hints of the future and peeks at the past. I mean the Legion was fighting a supervillain team in Superman's brain. Unreal.

Action continues to be the cream of the New 52. Consider me blown away!

Overall grade: A+

Thursday, February 2, 2012

Watchmen Prequels


It might be outside the usual scope of this blog but how could I not talk about the Watchmen Prequels announced yesterday.

The news is everywhere on the web, too many places to link, but if you head to Bleeding Cool or the DC Source blog I am sure you will get some information. DC is releasing Watchmen prequels, character driven mini-series. Here are the solicitations:

BEFORE WATCHMEN includes:

RORSCHACH (4 issues) – Writer: Brian Azzarello. Artist: Lee Bermejo
MINUTEMEN (6 issues) – Writer/Artist: Darwyn Cooke
COMEDIAN (6 issues) – Writer: Brian Azzarello. Artist: J.G. Jones
DR. MANHATTAN (4 issues) – Writer: J. Michael Straczynski. Artist: Adam Hughes
NITE OWL (4 issues) – Writer: J. Michael Straczynski. Artists: Andy and Joe Kubert
OZYMANDIAS (6 issues) – Writer: Len Wein. Artist: Jae Lee
SILK SPECTRE (4 issues) – Writer: Darwyn Cooke. Artist: Amanda Conner

These mini-series have been rumored to be coming out for the last several years and each time the rumbling would boil to the surface a bit, I said  the same thing.

"I won't buy them."

Like many comic fans, Watchmen holds a special place in my heart. I consider it the high water mark for comics in general. It is an easy benchmark for comics. "It's no Watchmen." is an easy way of labeling a book as lackluster. Watchmen is a dense, multi-layered, complete story with complex and flawed characters. I have reread the series so many times that I am on my third trade paperback. Each time I read it, I find something new to love about it.

And, as a result of that hallowed status, I didn't want to see it sullied with lackluster sequels or prequels.

"I won't buy them."


The thing is, when I look at these prequels, it is clear that DC decided to attach top flight talent to these books.

I mean Darwyn Cooke on the Minutemen? Cooke and Amanda Conner on Silk Spectre? Adam Hughes on Dr. Manhatten? Azzarello on Rorschach and The Comedian? I mean how can I, as a comic reader, not want to read those books.

So I think I am going to go against my prior thoughts, and buy some of these books.

Does that mean I am selling out? Have I lost my integrity?

Well, the first thing is that I have a track record of waffling on issues like this. So maybe I have some internal barometer that measures the level of  integrity I am willing to overlook. Maybe there are some works that I hold high enough that I don't want any taint of an inferior new project to detract.

I didn't read the Brian Herbert Dune books. I thought that story should have ended with Frank Herbert.

I didn't see the recent Thing prequel because the Carpenter movie is extremely beloved in my mind.

I did drop Doom Patrol after Grant Morrison left and Rachel Pollack came on board. But then I came back with Giffen wrote the latest version. Neither have changed my opinion about Morrison's run.

I did drop Swamp Thing when Rick Veitch took over for Alan Moore. But I have sampled other versions of Swampy since then, never sticking around long.

I dropped Miracleman when Neil Gaiman came on board. I have regretted it.


 I have puzzled this out all night and basically I have decided.

It's too big for me to figure out.

I can see both sides.

So maybe this is like the Batman in Dark Knight Returns. Like Commissioners Gordon and Yindel dealing with the Batman. This problem of artistic integrity, about sequels and prequels, about concerns of ruining a great work of art with a terrible follow-up, about the nature of these characters and their association with Alan Moore ... is simply too big an issue for me to figure out.


I think my initial worry about these books is that somehow if they were done wrong that it would detract from the original work. Could a lousy prequel ruin the original?

And I think the answer is maybe. But I don't think these books, given the names attached, will be fall that short. Man, I am being wishy-washy about this.

I still enjoy Sean Connery's James Bond despite hating Roger Moore's movies. I hated the Loeb/Joe Kelly Supergirl. That didn't detract from the prior Supergirl stories I loved. I hated the Matrix movie sequels but I still can enjoy the first movie.

But this is different. This is the Watchmen we are talking about. We aren't talking about Moonraker vs. Goldfinger. We are talking about *the* comic book, the big thing.

Well, going back to my first point, I think the talent attached to these books makes a difference. I trust that Azzarello is going to treat Rorschach and the Comedian the right way. I don't think I would buy a Rob Liefeld Comedian book. I wouldn't buy an Ed Benes Silk Spectre book.  I wouldn't read a Judd Winnick Ozymandias book. Heck, I am staying away from the JMS Nite Owl book because I haven't particularly liked a JMS book in some time. (Hughes' art trumps my dislike of JMS on the Manhatten book.) I would stay away from any Watchmen that did not bring a high caliber of talent to the table.

Do I think it is lousy that Moore has gotten something of a raw deal by DC when it comes to Watchmen. Yes.

Do I think that these books will not achieve the high level that Watchmen has in my mind. Yes. It is the high water mark for a reason.

But do I think these particular books are going to be good books worth reading? I think that answer is yes too. I trust Cooke. I trust Azzarello. I love Conner and Bermejo and Hughes and JG Jones.

All that said, I am worried about the upcoming Blade Runner prequel because the original Blade Runner movie is absolutely beloved by me. 

Plus ... this is the Watchmen!

And will these stories add anything to these characters that I need to know?

But does Moore get to be so haughty about these characters when he has been using other people's characters in Lost Girls and Extraordinary Gentlemen?


It's too big.

Watchmen is too big.

Wednesday, February 1, 2012

Supergirl Trade And Something Else I Want To Buy


Over on the DC Source Blog, they have been revealing the plans for the trades for not only the 'New 52' but also pre-relaunch titles and other goodies as well. Here is the link: http://dcu.blog.dccomics.com/2012/01/26/dc-comics-the-new-52-collected-editions-%E2%80%93-an-updated-look-at-2012/

Here is the Supergirl trade info (I am assuming the Supergirl #1 cover will be the trade dress).

Coming in October 2012:

SUPERGIRL VOL. 1: THE LAST DAUGHTER OF KRYPTON TP
Writer: Michael Green and Mike Johnson
Artist: Mahmud Asrar
Collects: SUPERGIRL #1-7
$14.99 US, 160 pg

Now, I question the timing of some of these. The Supergirl trade is due out in October 2012. That's 6 months after the last included issue. Wouldn't it be better to offer these things earlier so people could buy the trade and then maybe jump onto the floppies more easily? Of course, DC couldn't flood the market with the 52 trades all at once.

For me, I hope that DC takes advantage of the relaunch buzz by stuffing these first trades with extras. How about concept art around new costumes? Or interviews with the creators? How about a foreword? Or putting in the initial pitch? I posed the question to the creative team via Twitter.

Mahmud Asrar responded: "Don't know any official details but I definitely hope so. Personally I'd fill it up with extras. :)"

Do the right thing DC!

I will say that DC is doing the right thing with this ...




SHOWCASE PRESENTS: AMETHYST, PRINCESS OF GEMWORLD VOL. 1 TP

Writers: Dan Mishkin and Gary Cohen
Artists: Ernie Colon, Ric Estrada, Pablo Marcos, Alex Saviuk, Bob Smith, Gary Martin, Romeo Tanghal, Kurt Schaffenberger and Karl Kesel
Collects: LEGION OF SUPER-HEROES #298, AMETHYST, PRINCESS OF GEMWORLD #1-12, AMETHYST ANNUAL #1, DC COMICS PRESENTS #63 and AMETHYST #1-11
$19.99 US, 648 pg

In September 2012, DC is putting out a 'phone book' style Showcase collection of Amethyst, Princess of the Gemworld! Count me in!

I would have preferred more traditional trades, color reprints of the initial miniseries, etc. But at least I have something!

Hooray to DC for doing the right thing!